Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 12 Next »

Welcome to Ms. Pappas' Wiki Page!

Fall 2012

Fellows: Riley Meehan and Jessica Scolnic

Semester Outline:

Week 1: Intro Lesson: Tinfoil boats with penny loading

Introduce students to designing and making things in a scientific context.  Activity went well, students were all engaged, had a productive science discussion about what worked well and what did not.

Week 2: Intro to Earthquakes: Open-ended science discussion

STOMPers led more of a traditional lesson about P-waves/S-waves, plate tectonics etc.  Did wave demonstrations with slinky and rope.  Demos would have been better done on the floor as opposed to in mid air.  Purpose of this lesson was to engage students in thinking like scientists, not necessarily getting them to say all correct answers but just think critically about science concepts.  All students participated in full-class discussion and small group discussions, as well as "journal time."

Week 3-5: Develop an Engineering Scientific Model

Week 3: Planning

Week 4: Building

Week 5: Finishing touches and presentations/class discussion

Students reminded each other of a list of science related to earthquakes, broke up into groups to develop models of different important science ideas (eg: plates moving/fault lines, ground shaking, and earthquakes near water.)  Students requested a list of materials to be brought in next time, also had small group "share-out" time to get more ideas and suggestions about their designs.

STOMPers could have been clearer about the intentions and purposes of this activity-- many students fell back on the idea of building sturdy vs not sturdy buildings and demonstrating why they are that way, while our intention was to have them develop models of science concepts to be used in a variety of engineering tests later on.

When students did building, most of the models turned out really great-- students definitely thought about the concepts and developed skills to evaluate models.  However, all the projects turned out MESSY-- sand, dirt, water, clay, beans, etc; all the projects had to be dumped out at the end of Week 5. Therefore they could not be used as intended to move into engineering based on their models.

Week 6: Evaluate an Outside Model, Build a Sturdy Structure

STOMPers brought in a model they had constructed of "the ground shaking" out of some craft materials and an NXT motor.  STOMPers presented the model to the class as one constructed by another team, with different materials but studying the same topics.  The class watched the model run, and then wrote in their science journal answers to the following questions:  What is this a model of?  What does the model do well? What about it could be improved?  Students then talked about the model in small groups, then as a class.  Once it had been fleshed out, we did a blind vote on whether or not to accept the model into our class and use it for testing further projects.  The class voted to accept it, although a few kids disagreed---we had a discussion with students sharing arguments on both sides.  After the model had been accepted, we challenged them to build a two-story house out of raw spaghetti and clay that could survive the earthquake simulation.  We thought it would be difficult given the materials and the building requirements (the base could only be a certain size) but all groups built surviving structures; many groups did not the first time, but did a redesign.  This was a great culminating activity for the past 4 weeks of classes.

Spring 2012

Fellows: Alyssa Kody and Daniel Pavitt

Semester Outline

Activities


Fall 2011

Fellows: Alyssa Kody and Danielle Pike

Semester Outline

Activities

  • No labels