Contributing Factors in the Ongoing Water Conflict Between Bangladesh and India
Authors
Justine Treadwell and Ali Shafqat Akanda
Summary:
The existing 1996 Ganges water sharing treaty between India and Bangladesh has proven itself to be inadequate in handling record low flow situations. This case study depicts the water demands and uses, disagreements, and conflicts over the Ganges dry season flow and the effectiveness of the current water sharing mechanisms. The Ganges is a major source of water for Eastern India, supplying major urban centers, irrigating the fertile Gangetic Plain, and keeping the Port of Kolkata navigable throughout the year. The remainder of the share is used by downstream Bangladesh for irrigation, navigation, and maintaining the ecological balance of the Ganges estuaries. Here we identify national economic priorities, an asymmetry of power, and extreme physical conditions at play for the continuation of the conflict over dry season streamflow. The Ganges is an integral part of the society, as well as economy, religion, and the environment of the eastern part of the Indian Subcontinent. Economic priorities such as food grain production, and maintaining the navigability of Kolkata Port, led to the construction of a barrage at Farakka, near the border with Bangladesh. For the downstream riparian country, freshwater availability depends on the share of water diverted by upstream India, and as a result Bangladesh has experienced a 50% decrease of dry season mean flow amounts since the commissioning of the barrage in 1975. Such drastic reductions have caused a series of problems including drop in agro and fish productivity, saltwater intrusion and ecological imbalance in estuarine areas, and reduced navigation.
Issues Addressed and Lessons Learned
In this case study, we address the (a) role of an asymmetry of power vis-à-vis economic incentives as factors in successful negotiation over water conflicts, and the (b) impact of water scarcity on the natural environment. An asymmetry of economic, political, and military power, and lack of economic incentives have allowed India to not address this conflict in a serious manner. As a result, the lack of progress in this issue compounded by a frequent recurrence of drought years have caused environmental and socio-economic problems, as well as a growing sense of helplessness and anger, and hardened public opinion in Bangladesh. This case study identifies the main interactions and feedbacks at play between economic choices, asymmetric power, and frequent droughts at the root of this conflict. This also shows how the extreme seasonality of physical conditions can cause failure of existing governance structures, especially over transboundary domains.
1. Issues, Context, and relevant NSS Variables Summary
| |
Stakeholders |
Variables Involved |
| Dry Season Water Supply |
India and Bangladesh |
Quantity (Q), Governance (G) |
| Irrigation |
India and Bangladesh |
Quantity (Q), Economy (C) |
| River Navigability |
India and Bangladesh |
Quantity (Q), Economy (C), Governance (G) |
| Estuarine Ecosystem |
India and Bangladesh |
Quantity (Q), Quality (P), Ecological Services (E), Governance (G), Economy (C) |
The Ganges River and its distributaries have given rise to one of the most densely populated and culturally vibrant regions on earth. Due to the pressures of population growth and economic development, India constructed and began to operate the Farakka Barrage in northeast India in the mid 1970s. The barrage has indeed spurred the economic growth of West Bengal state of India, but as a result of the water diversion project, downstream users of the Ganges in Bangladesh are suffering from water shortages that may only worsen in spite of the water-sharing treaty that has been in place since 1996. The shortcomings of the 1996 treaty are not likely to be overcome unless the underlying economic and political causes of the dispute are addressed. Due to India's relative political, military, and economic/trade advantages as well as its status as the upper riparian state in the dispute, it may be up to Bangladesh to create economic, political, and/or strategic incentives that may motivate India to consider long-term scientific solutions that will help to ensure that the needs of all South Asia's people are met.
2. Description of the Setting
The Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) river system is one of the largest freshwater flow regimes in the world. Two large east Himalayan rivers, the Ganges and the Brahmaputra, are joined by the Meghna, which originates in one of the most rain-prone areas of the world, and drain through Bangladesh to the ocean. In the process, these rivers have built up the Bengal Delta, the largest and most populated delta on earth. The Brahmaputra originates on the Tibetan plateau, traverses about 1800 km through the Himalayas and enters Bangladesh through the northeastern part of India. The Ganges originates in India in the foothills of the Himalayas and flows for about 1500 km before it enters Bangladesh through the western side (Chowdhury & Ward, 2006). The two rivers merge inside Bangladesh and flow about 150 km as the Padma (the local name inside Bangladesh) before joining with the Meghna and flowing into the Bay of Bengal (Figure 1). Five countries, India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, and China are considered riparian neighbors of this huge basin.

Figure 1: Regional setting of the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Meghna basins
The Ganges River Basin spans from its headwaters in north-central India and the Himalayan Mountains of southwestern Nepal to the Bay of Bengal coast in Bangladesh. After coming down from the Himalayas, the river meanders through the northern plains of India, from Uttar Pradesh to the West Bengal province. On its path lie the historic Mughal cities of Lucknow and Allahabad, and the Hindu holy cities of Bodhgaya and Varanasi. The Ganges River, being the lifeline of the local and regional environment, has been an integral part of the historical, cultural, social, and religious belief system for the inhabitants of this region. Being a major transboundary river, it has established its presence in the regional political and diplomatic domains as well.
Physical and Social Attributes
| Location |
South Asia, central to eastern Subcontinent: lies within latitudes 23° N and 30° N and longitudes 73° E and 90° E |
| Water Population |
1,147,995,904153 million |
| Watershed Area |
950,000 sq km |
| Average Annual Rainfall |
1400 mm |
| Average Annual Temperature |
-4 C to +41 C |
| Top Uses of Water |
Irrigation, River Navigation, Domestic Supply, Estuarine Navigation (Flushing of silt at Kolkata port) |
3. Problem Definition
As the majority of the drainage basin area is not situated in Bangladesh, the contribution of local rainfall to these flows is less dominant, especially in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins. However, prolonged local rainfall in the months of July and August, when the major rivers are also at peak, aggravate the flooding situation (Chowdhury & Ward, 2004).

Figure 3: Seasonal streamflow hydrograph of major rivers
On the other hand, the region has a contrastingly dry low flow season compared to the typically wet rainy reason. As we can observe in the hydrographs (Figure 3), the flow cycles are highly seasonal. The lowest flows in the Brahmaputra and the Ganges rivers are recorded during December-March and are typically one-tenth and one-twentieth of the average flood flows in respective rivers (WARPO - Water Resources Planning Organization of Bangladesh, 2000a). Thus, drought is another commonly occurring natural phenomenon in Bangladesh and is not confined to the dry season. Most of the annual precipitation in this basin occurs during the four months of the monsoon period (Mirza et al. 2001). As most agricultural lands of the country are dependent on seasonal rainfall for plantation of rice, rainfall variability, such as a late or inadequate monsoon, water deficits during certain periods of the year can induce severe stress on crops and reduce yield in this predominantly agricultural country.
Sharing these transboundary rivers has been a major socio-political issue since the birth of India and Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan). This region is the home of hundreds of millions of people, who live along the banks of these great rivers and their flows are an integral part of the peoples' social, economic, and cultural lives. Thus, the amount of streamflow in these rivers or the lack of it profoundly affects their lives in general. The primary source of conflict over the Ganges has been the commissioning of the Farakka barrage in the year 1975, which was originally constructed to divert water from the main river in the dry season to flush the sediments gathering in the river Hooghly, a distributary of the system that provides navigation for the port of Kolkata (Figure 4). Since the barrage started its operations, low flow water availability has dropped considerably (Tanzeema & Faisal 2001) which has led to serious drought problems and saltwater intrusion problems in southwestern Bangladesh (Rahman et al 2000).
According to Tanzeema and Faisal (2001), an integrated basin-wide management of these rivers, especially the Ganges, would have been an ideal and technically correct solution to the many water related problems faced by the people of Bangladesh and India. Unfortunately the existing social, economic, and political realities of the region have only allowed a limited solution for the water sharing problems. India has signed several bilateral treaties with its neighbors, such as Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh; nevertheless, there has not been any approach looking at the problems from a basin scale, nor has there been any initiative to exchange water resources data extensively between these countries for water planning and management objectives.
With regards to the Farakka Barrage, Bangladesh has signed two water-sharing agreements so far, most recently in 1996 (table 3), to manage the water efficiently between the two countries during the dry season. However, this agreement has already proved inadequate for extreme drought situations and has limited provisions for improvement. The socio-economic and environmental impacts of extreme drought years and lack of agreement between the two riparian countries to modify the agreement may lead to future conflicts.

Figure 4: Location of Farakka Barrage (Rahman et al 2000)
| Date |
Event |
| 1951-74 |
Discussion of potential barrage begins. No agreement reached. Joint Rivers Commission formed. |
| 1974-76 |
India builds barrage without agreement. Operation began in '75. In '76-77, India withdrew water unilaterally causing water shortage in Bangladesh, which took issue to UN |
| 1977-82 |
5-year agreement signed with water distributed every ten days Jan-May. Agreement not renewed at expiry. |
| 1982-88 |
Two MOUs were signed; the last expired in 1988. No progress was made on flow augmentation. |
| 1988-96 |
Multiple high-level meetings produced no results because India wanted precondition of augmentation plan. |
| 1996 onwards |
A 30-yr treaty was signed after changes in government. The treaty specifies dry season water levels that are generally agreeable except for times of extreme drought, during which Bangladesh suffers |
Table 3: Timeline of the Farakka dispute (Tanzeema and Faisal, 2001)
4. Variable Identification
A review of current literature on the Ganges reveals that the issue of major concern is the quantity of water available to the mega-city of Kolkata and to southwestern Bangladesh, both of which rely on the Ganges water for short- and long-term needs. However, there is evidence that the underlying causes of water quantity problems are of political and economic nature, both in the conditions that had lead to the construction and implementation of the Farakka Barrage itself, as well as those precluding a fair and workable long-term water sharing agreement. Politically and militarily, India is by far the stronger of the two nations, and wishes to not only maintain its dominance but also enhance it; these factors are reinforced by India's advantageous terms of trade, economic growth, and position as the upper riparian state. Any future effort to resolve the ongoing dispute between India and Bangladesh must address these underlying variables to be successful in the long run. The remaining part of this section will describe the three main underlying variables: Quantity, Economics, and Institutions (political, military, and technical).
(A) Quantity: Water Scarcity Issues and Existing Agreements
The impact of the Farakka Barrage on dry season flow in the Ganges and the subsequent impact on the ecology of southwestern Bangladesh
The diversion of dry season flow at the Farakka barrage in India has shown a long-term impact on the flow characteristics of the Ganges. Since the Farakka Barrage was implemented in 1975, the mean dry season flow has never exceeded the long-term average (Figure 5). While the annual flow patterns have been minimally affected, the dry season flow has declined to less than 50 percent of the long-term average (Figure 6). Table 4 shows the impact of the Farakka barrage in comparison with the previous decades of available data, where the April and May mean flow values have dropped to less than 1000 m3/s for the 1990s. An additional important observation in Table 4 is that fourteen (14) of the lowest monthly flow values (all below 1000 m3/s) have occurred within the past twenty (20) years.

Figure 5: Long-term Annual and Dry Season (FMA) Flow Trends of the Ganges
The present water-sharing agreement between India and Bangladesh has proven itself inadequate due to the limited provision of sharing dry season flows and also because it contains no contingencies for modification should problems arise. In addition, the entity responsible for overseeing transboundary water issues, the India/Bangladesh Joint Rivers Commission (JRC), cannot bilaterally discuss and reach fruitful settlements without involving respective higher governmental authorities (Tanzeema & Faisal 2001). Indeed, the JRC has "no teeth," is prone to beaurocratic bottlenecks, and its members are highly influenced by political pressures from their respective countries. Some recent droughts and unexpectedly low flow amounts in the Ganges during recent dry seasons (1993-96) have led to serious water scarcities on both sides of the border. There is wide agreement in both Bangladesh and India that the agreement needs to be revised to address scarcity issues in severe flow months or seasons.
Impacts on Quality and Ecosystem Services
The reduction of dry season flow in the Ganges has led to various water quality and ecological problems in southwestern Bangladesh. The main impact of reduced low flow values has been the drop in hydraulic head of the Ganges river system, and the consequent increase in salinity in southwestern Bangladesh Rivers (Rahman et al. 2001). The increased salinity has led water quality problems in groundwater aquifers, and drop in agricultural production and freshwater fish yield. The increase of salinity in the Ganges distributaries has also led to ecological impacts on the world's largest mangrove forest, the Sundarbans, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. A salinity level of 10 ppt (parts per thousand) in the water inundating the shores of the canals and the rivers of the Sundarbans area have led to the "top dying;" a disease of the prevalent native Sundari trees. Symptoms of this disease include burning and firing of leaf tips of margins, bronzing, premature yellowing, abscission of leaves, and eventual dying of the trees (Hoque et al. 2006).

Table 4: Monthly Flow Trends in the Ganges for 1940-2000
(B) Economics: Past and Present Issues, and Future Possibilities
Economic issues between India and Bangladesh: Bangladesh's Comparative "Disadvantage"
India is the largest country in the South Asian region in terms land mass, population, and GDP, and the India/Bangladesh relationship is largely a function of the disproportionate economic power that India enjoys. India's GDP is more than ten times that of Bangladesh; its per capita GDP is more than twice that of Bangladesh. At nine percent per year, India's economy is also growing 50 percent faster than Bangladesh's (CIA, 2008), meaning that, rather than shrinking in magnitude, the issue of disparity is likely to grow. India also has a distinct trade advantage over Bangladesh, with exports from India constituting 15 percent of Bangladesh's total imports but just three percent of India's exports. India is now Bangladesh's single largest source of imports; at the same time, Indian imports from Bangladesh make up a negligible proportion (about .01%) of India's total imports. Through the South Asian Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA), India currently grants tariff concessions for selective items to Bangladesh (World Bank, 2006).
India's Desire for Regional Economic Dominance and its Impact on the Farakka Dispute
One potential solution to the Ganges dispute is construction of reservoirs in the Nepalese headwaters of the Ganges, which would help to ensure sufficient Ganges water outflow during times of drought. Dams could also be constructed to generate hydroelectric power that India could purchase from Nepal, to address the ballooning energy deficit that is expected to reach 20,000 MW by 2010 (AsiaTradeHub.com). Nepal is endowed with enormous hydropower resources: roughly 42,000 MW of economically feasible hydropower potential, less then 1 percent of which has been developed. However, talks with Nepal have consistently faltered, and India has made it clear that it is not interested in this path. Should India collaborate with Nepal, "Nepal would have been in an ideal position to turn the tables on the Indian government. Nepal could then, if it had chosen, have exploited its advantageous location and exerted pressure on the India government over not only the Farakka issue, but perhaps also to more general political and economic advantage" (Jacques, 2000). However, Bangladesh does appear to have some leverage power over a proposed natural gas pipeline. The countries' neighbor to the East, Myanmar, is rich in natural gas that India would like to import; but, to do so, it would have to run a pipeline through Bangladesh. Although in 2005 Bangladesh agreed on the principle of the plan, no agreement was signed (Sengupta, 2005). Yet India's energy deficit, however, grows by the day.
The Ganges as Fuel for Transnational Economic Growth - and Conflict
The lower Ganges has been of critical importance in the development and growth of both countries: in Bangladesh to ensure accessible water for the agricultural and domestic use of its growing, densely-packed rural population, and in maintaining the integrity of the ecologically valuable Sundarbans; and in India for the growth of the mega-city of Kolkata. Kolkata is the third largest city in India with a population of 14 million, and the most industrial of all India's cities (World Bank, "Urbanization"). By 1921, Kolkata was home to one-third of India's manufacturing population, and by the 1970s more than half a million were employed in its manufacturing sector (Encyclopedia, 2008). The River Hooghly, an offshoot of the Ganges, has historically been the heart of Kolkata's industry, with most of the textile mills built on the river's banks. The Hooghly is also critical to the trade and navigation system: if the river were to drop below navigable level, ships would no longer be able to access the city from the Bay of Bengal, at great monetary and logistical expense to the industrial sector. The river is also the source of the city's water supply.
Without the Farakka Barrage to flush the Hooghly during the driest months of the year, India would not have been able to support the fast-growing population and industrial sector of Kolkata. Hundreds of thousands would have lost jobs and livelihoods. The government of India is thus under tremendous pressure from its constituents in West Bengal state to continue diverting water at Farakka at levels that, depending on weather conditions, may leave southwestern Bangladesh in severe water-scarcity. As one Indian citizen complained, if we can no longer rely on a sufficient Hooghly flow level, traders "will have to opt for other ports on the east coast at a terrific cost. Can the Government really allow this to happen?" (Sanyal, 2001).
(C) Institutions and Political-Military Issues
The 2001 paper "Sharing the Ganges: A Critical Analysis of the Water Sharing Treaties" argues that "prevailing political mood has always been the main factor in successful negotiations," and that the India/ Bangladesh conflict was no exception. The states were successful in developing the 1996 treaty due to political will after changes in government in both countries (Tanzeema, 2001). Thus, a discussion of the political histories of the two countries is relevant in determining where the best opportunities for conflict resolution may lie. The two states' political histories are closely intertwined, beginning with India's military assistance to Bangladesh (then East Pakistan) during the war for independence from Pakistan in ¬¬¬¬¬1971. Bangladeshis in general have maintained goodwill toward India for that assistance; but the military has been and remains "anti-India" due to long-standing hard feelings over the last stages of the war, when "the Mukti Bahini alleged that the Indian army stole their thunder by stepping in and when the Pakistan forces surrendered to Lt. Gen. Jagjit Singh Aurora of the Indian army, the Mukti Bahini was not represented during the surrender ceremony, independent Bangladesh inherited not only a politicized military but also an uneasy civil-military equation" (Mohsin, 2001).
Nevertheless, the two states had good relations through 1975, the year that India completed construction of the Farakka Barrage and was given consent by then-Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Mujibur Rahman to run a ten-day test of its operation. The Indian government not only completed the test run, it also made the "provocative decision to continue diverting the Ganges flow after the expiration of [the ten day] agreement" (Jacques, 2000). Mujib, who was considered "India-friendly," was assassinated three months later in a military coup. The following year, in 1976, India again provoked Bangladesh by unilaterally diverting water at Farakka, causing a severe water shortage in Bangladesh (Tanzeema, 2001). Following Mujib's assassination, Zia's administration was mindful of India's violation of the ten-day agreement and was considerably less India-friendly when it came to protecting scarce water resources during the dry season. In security matters, too, "Zia moved away from India and came closer to China" due in part to feelings over the liberation war (Mohsin, 2001). This alliance with China marked the beginning of a complex post-independence military dynamic between India and Bangladesh.
The Pakistan/India conflict over the Kashmir territory provided a strong incentive for both Pakistan and India to develop economic and security alliances with other countries in the region - including Bangladesh, which, in spite of post-independence scars, nevertheless shares a cultural and political history with Pakistan. Economically, Pakistan and Bangladesh maintained trade ties since President Zia's visit to Pakistan in 1977 (Jacques, 2000). Militarily, Pakistan, has provided support to Bangladesh over the past decades, and supported Bangladesh on the Farakka issue, through which Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto "was able to cultivate Pakistan's increasingly important Islamic ties, and at the same time, gain wider support in keeping Indian regional ambitions in check" (Jacques, 2000).
At the same time, the Bangladesh military establishment has resisted forging security ties with India. In some cases, political leaders at the highest level have voiced objections to such things as defense purchases from India, even when they were the most obvious potential supplier (Mohsin, 2001). This was the case in 1996, when Khaleda Zia "raised strong objections to the proposed defense purchases of Indian trucks and Russian MiG-29s - questioning the very wisdom of making defense deals with India and questioning the quality of the vehicles also. The opposition has further alleged that the government aims to turn the Bangladeshi armed forces into a wing of the Indian army. Such allegations can have profound implications, for the Bangladesh military has a strong anti-India bias" (Mohsin, 2001).
With a military over ten times the size and with thirty times the defense budget of Bangladesh's, as well as nuclear capabilities (Burns, 1998), India's military superiority is hard to dispute, and has played a key role in enabling India to prevail on the Farakka issue (Jacques, 2000). However, given India's regional security concerns – epitomized in the recent attacks on Mumbai that were at least in part orchestrated by Pakistani militants (Perlez, 2008) – there may be an opportunity for Bangladesh to bring its own political-military power to bear on water issues with India. India's relations with Bangladesh have been most cordial during periods of simultaneous easing of India's "tension-ridden" relationship with Pakistan and China (Jacques, 2000). Conversely, during times of heightened tension between Pakistan and India, Bangladesh may be in a stronger position to seek concessions from India on the Farakka dispute.
5. Summary
The mighty Ganges River and its distributaries have given rise to one of the most densely populated and culturally vibrant regions on earth. Due to the pressures of population growth and economic development, India constructed and began to operate the Farakka Barrage in northeast India. The barrage has indeed spurred the economic growth of West Bengal state of India, but as a result of the water diversion project, downstream users of the Ganges in Bangladesh are suffering from water shortages that are predicted to only worsen in spite of the water-sharing treaty that has been in place since 1996. The shortcomings of the 1996 treaty are not likely to be overcome unless the underlying economic and political causes of the dispute are addressed. Due to India's relative political, military, and economic/trade advantages and its status as the upper riparian state in the dispute, it may be up to Bangladesh to create economic, political, and/or military incentives that may motivate India to consider long-term scientific solutions that will help to ensure that the needs of all South Asia's people are met.
6. Issues Addressed and Lessons Learned
In this case study, we address the (a) role of an asymmetry of power vis-à-vis economic incentives as factors in successful negotiation over water conflicts, and the (b) impact of water scarcity on the natural environment. An asymmetry of economic, political, and military power, and lack of economic incentives have allowed India to not address this conflict in a serious manner. As a result, the lack of progress in this issue compounded by a frequent recurrence of drought years have caused environmental and socio-economic problems, as well as a growing sense of helplessness and anger, and hardened public opinion in Bangladesh. This case study identifies the main interactions and feedbacks at play between economic choices, asymmetric power, and frequent droughts at the root of this conflict. This also shows how the extreme seasonality of physical conditions can cause failure of existing governance structures, especially over transboundary domains.
7. References
Burns, John F. "Nuclear Anxiety: The Overview; Pakistan, Answering India, Carries Out Nuclear Tests; Clinton's Appeal Rejected." New York Times, 29 May 1998.
Chowdhury, M.R., & M.N. Ward, 2007. Seasonal flooding in Bangladesh - variability and predictability. Hydrol. Process. 21, 335-347.
CIA World Fact Book-Bangladesh. Retrieved on November 26, 2008 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bg.html
CIA World Fact Book-India. Retrieved on November 26, 2008 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html
Das Gupta, A., M.S. Babel, X. Albert & O. Mark, 2005. Water Sector of Bangladesh in the Context of Integrated Water Resources Management: A Review, Water Resources Development, Vol. 21, No. 2, 385-398.
Farlex Encyclopedia. Retrieved on December 8, 2008 from http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/Kolkata,+West+Bengal
Hoque, A., M.S.K.A. Sarkar, S.A.K.U. Khan, M.A.H. Moral & A.K.M. Khurram, 2006. Present Status of Salinity Rise in Sundarbans Area and its Effect on Sundari (Heritiera fomes) Species, Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 2(3): 115-121.
Hussain, M. Sakhawat, "Hope for Better Indo-Bangla Relations." May 26, 2004. Retrieved on December 1, 2008 from http://www.thedailystar.net/2004/05/26/d40526020433.htm
Jacques, Kathryn. Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan: International Relations and Regional Tension in South Asia. Macmillan Press, 2000.
Mirza, M.M.Q., R.A. Warrick, N.J. Ericksen, & G.J. Kenny, 2001. Are peak flows getting worse in the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna basins? Environmental Hazards, 3 (2001) 37-48.
Mohsin, Amena., "Bangladesh: An Uneasy Accommodation." Coercion and Governance: The Declining Political Role of the Military in Asia. Edited by Muthiah Alagappa. Stanford U Press, Stanford, CA. 2001.
Perlez, Jane and Salman Masmood, "Pakistan Detains Founder of Group Suspected in Attacks." Retrieved December 11, 2008 from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/world/asia/12pstan.html?scp=1&sq=mumbai%20attacks%20pakistan&st=cse
Rahman, M.M., M. Hassan, M.S. Islam, & S.Z.K.M. Shamsad, 2000. Environmental impact assessment on water quality deterioration caused by the decreased Ganges outflow and saline water intrusion in south-western Bangladesh. Environmental Geology, 40 (1-2).
"Rivers Dying as Ganges Project Remains in Limbo." January 26, 2008. Retrieved on December 1, 2008 from http://www.bangladeshnews.com.bd/2008/01/26/rivers-dying-as-ganges-project-remains-in-limbo/
Sanyal, Santanu, "Kolkata port: Government support vital." The Hindu Business Line. November 19, 2001. Retrieved December 1, 2008 from http://www.hinduonnet.com/businessline/logistic/2001/11/19/stories/0919c05s.htm
Sengupta, Somini. "Hunger for Energy Transforms How India Operates." New York Times, 5 June 2005. Retrieved on December 11, 2008 from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C00E0DE1538F936A35755C0A9639C8B63&scp=1&sq=india%20burma%20bangladesh%20pipeline&st=cse
Tanzeema, S. & I.M. Faisal, 2001. Sharing the Ganges: a critical analysis of the water sharing treaties, Water Policy 3 (2001) 13-28.
The World Bank (1). "India and Bangladesh: Bilateral Trade." December 2006. Retrieved on December 8, 2008 at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/SOUTHASIAEXT/0,,contentMDK:21177520~pagePK:146736~piPK:146830~theSitePK:223547,00.html
The World Bank (2), "Urbanization in India Integral Part of Economic Growth." Retrieved on December 3, 2008 from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/SOUTHASIAEXT/EXTSARREGTOPMACECOGRO/0,,contentMDK:21531567~menuPK:579440~pagePK:34004173~piPK:34003707~theSitePK:579398,00.html
WARPO, Water Resources Planning Organization of Bangladesh Annual Report, 2000a.